I don’t know how to solve this problem or what to do with this information. I’m not riled up. I’m informed. I like seeing some numbers, having some sense of the scope of a problem. I like knowing where things stand. Hopefully these numbers will encourage review outlets to be more inclusive in reviewing books—considering race, gender and let us not forget sexuality or other brands of difference—rather than treating diversity as a compartmentalized issue where we can only focus on one kind of inequity at a time. Such mindfulness is important. If we want to encourage people to be better, broader readers, that effort starts by giving readers a better, broader selection of books to choose from.
-
zeroatthebone reblogged this from realkidsgoodbooks
-
shewriteswrites likes this
-
emotionofateaspoon reblogged this from thegirlwrites
-
thegirlwrites reblogged this from yahighway
-
yahighway reblogged this from rachelfershleiser
-
danielleh likes this
-
yanez95danny likes this
-
ljdigital reblogged this from rachelfershleiser
-
pictureblue reblogged this from realkidsgoodbooks
-
cherishedsaulie likes this
-
inventthisplease likes this
-
peninkbirthmarks likes this
-
cheshire3000 likes this
-
harperbooks likes this
-
condalmo reblogged this from rachelfershleiser and added:
is an imbalance. However,...those other datasets, such as How does this compare
-
dirtyriver reblogged this from rachelfershleiser
-
lettersforburning likes this
-
jacob likes this
-
jrichmanesq likes this
-
dontfuckemiftheydontread reblogged this from rachelfershleiser
-
fictionthatmatters reblogged this from penamerican
-
thelifeguardlibrarian likes this
-
penamerican reblogged this from rachelfershleiser
-
thecultureofme reblogged this from rachelfershleiser
-
rachelwebber likes this
-
rachelfershleiser posted this

