#education #occupyedu #ctchat #occupy
Why teach critical thinking of not for revolution? Revolution is change, transformation, innovation. It’s a concept that is inevitable if people learn to think, learn to learn, learn that they are the creators of culture. Critical thinking embraces the…
Education Blog Bundle curated by Shelly Terrell (Cooperative Catalyst blogger)
- 2¢ Worth
- A Principal’s Reflections
- A techie’s view
- Bits ‘n Bytes from Ann Carnevale
- Blogging About The Web 2.0 Connected Classroom
- Burlington H.S. Principal’s Blog
- Carol’s thoughts on life, ICT and whatever comes
- Cooperative Catalyst
- Dangerously Irrelevant
- Deron Durflinger- Van Meter Secondary Principal Blog
- E-verything!
- edbuzz.org
- Edgalaxy - Where Education and Technology Meet
- education & tech
- Educational Technology - ICT in Education
- Free Technology for Teachers
- Ideas and Thoughts from an EdTech
- iLearn Technology
- Language Journeys
- Mr. Gonzalez’s Classroom
- My Island View
- ONE FOOT IN REALITY
- Pair-a-Dimes on DavidTruss.com
- peoplegogy
- Seth’s Blog
- So You Want To Teach?
- Teacher Reboot Camp
- Technology Tidbits: Thoughts of a Cyber Hero
- The Nerdy Teacher
- The New Tag’s Blog
- The Principal of Change
- The Pursuit of Technology Integration Happiness
- The Techno Tiger
- Twitter Exercise Motivation Team
- What Ed Said
- you blog
- ZarcoEnglish - Students’ Showcase
- Kids learned to use e-readers quickly even though 43 percent of them had never used a computer before. Also, not surprisingly, they were quick to discover “the multimedia aspects of the e-reader, such as music and Internet features.”
- Near-zero theft. Only two e-readers (out of 600) were lost in the whole study, partly because “community involvement was encouraged through e-reader pledges, community outreach programs, and support from community leaders.”
- Kids got access to way more books. Before the study, primary-school students had access to an average of 3.6 books at home. Junior-high students had access to an average of 8.6 books at home and high-school students access to an average of 11 books. With the e-reader program, kids had access to an average of 107 book.
- Primary school students’ test scores improved, but effects on older kids were less clear. The reading scores of primary-school students who received e-readers increased from 12.9 percent to 15.7 percent. But results for older kids were mixed.
- Students sought out access to international news. “Amazon data revealed that students were downloading The New York Times, USA Today, and El País etc., demonstrating that students want to access a wide range of reading materials that were previously inaccessible.”
- Kindles break too easily. Worldreader had not predicted how many Kindles would break: 243 out of 600, or 40.5 percent.
- The program appears cost-effective. Worldreader estimates that “for the years 2014-2018, using a calculation focused strictly on the provisioning of textbooks, the e-reader system would cost only $8.93-$11.40 more per student over a 4 year period [$0.19 to $0.24 per month] than the traditional paper book system.”
We started 90 Second Newbery a few weeks ago at my school.
This project entails students reading a Newbery award winning book, creating a script, filming a 90 segment reenacting key parts of the book, editing their film, and then presenting it.
In the link above, there is a video of “A…
Remember those library books that no one used to take out? This blog found them.
(via Awful Library Books)
WE WON! Thanks to your votes, Brooklyn Public Library will receive $250,000 from Partners in Preservation for restoration of our Central Library front doors.
Brooklyn Central Library on winning the crowdsourced $250,000 preservation grant in NYC.
Vote to help us restore Central Library’s iconic front doors.
(via fictionthatmatters)
Harriet on why Joshua Clover and 11 poets may face jail time for protesting at UC Davis.
The New York City Department of Education issued its first guidelines for how teachers should navigate social media following a rise in the number of complaints involving school employees who inappropriately contact students through Facebook, texting and email.
Terry’s principal, Philip Weinberg, calls the guidelines common sense.
“As an old English teacher, even the language of that kind of interaction is problematic,” he says. “We know that we’re not our students’ friends as much as we love them and care about them in genuine ways. We need to establish specific boundaries about the kinds of interactions we have with young people.”
Friend Your Students? New York City Schools Say No : All Tech Considered : NPR
The school I’m going to does not have any policies on social networking and students. When I interviewed the cheerleading coach told me that she is friends with a lot of the kids on Facebook.
What are the reasons for a public school teacher to be friends with your students?
(via itssnix)
Why Is General McChrystal Teaching an Off-the-Record Course at Yale?
McChrystal, who formerly led special operations forces in Iraq and Afghanistan and later became a senior American commander in Afghanistan, now teaches a class at Yale’s Grand Strategy Program, where he integrates his military experience with his studies on leadership. In the New York Times, McCyrstal is quoted as saying “the only reason I’m here to teach,” compared with “somebody who’s got a Ph.D., is because I’ve been through it.”
McChrystal must have been through something ominous because, according to Elisabeth Bumiller’s Times article, Yale University imposes restrictions on students who sit in McChrystal’s classes, demanding that they take notes on an “off the record” basis — i.e., not for attribution.
Yale’s extraordinary act seems drastically out of place with notions of academic and intellectual freedom. At the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, where I teach history, intellectual freedom is fiercely encouraged and protected. In addition, there is also accountability. No matter what I say in my history classes - either about history or my combat experience — cadets are free to tell it to the world, critique it, or reject it privately or publicly. Restrictions on cadets don’t exist even for an instructor with direct ties to the U.S. military.
Read more. [Image: Reuters]



![theatlantic:
Why Is General McChrystal Teaching an Off-the-Record Course at Yale?
McChrystal, who formerly led special operations forces in Iraq and Afghanistan and later became a senior American commander in Afghanistan, now teaches a class at Yale’s Grand Strategy Program, where he integrates his military experience with his studies on leadership. In the New York Times, McCyrstal is quoted as saying “the only reason I’m here to teach,” compared with “somebody who’s got a Ph.D., is because I’ve been through it.”
McChrystal must have been through something ominous because, according to Elisabeth Bumiller’s Times article, Yale University imposes restrictions on students who sit in McChrystal’s classes, demanding that they take notes on an “off the record” basis — i.e., not for attribution.
Yale’s extraordinary act seems drastically out of place with notions of academic and intellectual freedom. At the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, where I teach history, intellectual freedom is fiercely encouraged and protected. In addition, there is also accountability. No matter what I say in my history classes - either about history or my combat experience — cadets are free to tell it to the world, critique it, or reject it privately or publicly. Restrictions on cadets don’t exist even for an instructor with direct ties to the U.S. military.
Read more. [Image: Reuters]](http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m4jeb92KSy1qcokc4o1_1280.jpg)